다운로드 SAP : C-DBADM-2601 질문 & 답 PDF & Test Software

A regional packaging logistics company uses SAP HANA for shipment planning analytics. The administrator reviews recovery readiness after a backup retention adjustment. SAP HANA cockpit shows recent successful backups, but the recovery workbook still references the previous retention window for selecting recovery artifacts. A validation attempt can see current backup entries, yet the documented recovery sequence would exclude one required log backup under the new retention setting.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove the documented recovery process reflects the active retention configuration. The team cannot approve readiness if the workbook selects artifacts using an outdated retention assumption.
What should the administrator do next?

• A. Ignore the missing log backup because the validation attempt can still see current backup entries.
• B. Update the recovery workbook to the active retention configuration, select the required backup sequence, and rerun validation.
• C. Approve recovery readiness because SAP HANA cockpit shows recent successful backup entries.
• D. Create another data backup so the recovery sequence can use only the newest backup entry.

A regional medical devices distributor is preparing an SAP HANA upgrade rehearsal for an on-premises database. The upgrade package is available, and the database is currently running. Before the rehearsal begins, the administrator compares the maintenance checklist with the validation output and finds that the prerequisite check was completed before the latest package was staged. SAP HANA cockpit still shows normal availability, and the technical lead wants to proceed because the system has not reported an error.
The constraint is that the administrator must base the upgrade decision on preparation evidence that matches the current package state. The rehearsal should not begin from validation output created before the final staged artifact was present.
What should the administrator do before starting the rehearsal?

• A. Add a note to the checklist explaining that the prerequisite check was completed before package staging.
• B. Restart the database so the earlier prerequisite output can be refreshed during the upgrade startup sequence.
• C. Proceed with the rehearsal because the database is available and no current SAP HANA cockpit error is visible.
• D. Rerun the prerequisite validation after confirming the final staged package, then start only if the current checks pass.

A regional public-sector records office performs a SAP HANA recovery test after updating its backup schedule. The backup monitor shows recent backups completed, but the recovery test log indicates that the selected recovery point does not match the retention window defined for the updated schedule. The administrator can still access the backup catalog, and no production outage has occurred.
The constraint is that the recovery test must prove resilience under the current backup schedule, not under a previous retention assumption. The administrator must determine whether the recovery evidence is usable for sign-off or whether the selected recovery point invalidates the test result.
What is the best next action?

• A. Sign off the recovery test because recent backups completed and the catalog remains accessible.
• B. Ignore the mismatch because no production outage occurred during the exercise.
• C. Change the retention window to match the recovery point used in the test log.
• D. Repeat the recovery test using a recovery point aligned with the current backup schedule and update the resilience evidence after validation.

A regional commercial cleaning company uses SAP HANA for workforce allocation analytics in an on-premises environment. After planned maintenance, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, and users can refresh dashboards. During validation, the administrator finds that the post-start checklist was completed from an administrator workspace that still points to the previous maintenance profile. The active operations profile used by the scheduled administration cycle has not been validated after startup.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove the active operations profile is ready for scheduled administration. The activity cannot be closed based on evidence from a workspace that is no longer the operational reference.
Which action best resolves the post-start validation issue?

• A. Close the activity because SAP HANA cockpit shows availability and dashboard refresh succeeds.
• B. Keep using the previous maintenance profile until the next scheduled administration cycle completes.
• C. Validate the active operations profile after startup, rerun the scheduled administration checks, and record the evidence.
• D. Restart the database so the previous maintenance profile automatically becomes aligned with the operations profile.

CHALLENGE 1 - Plant Wave Configuration Evidence Alignment
During rollout preparation, plant quality test users can connect to both SAP HANA reporting systems. The newly installed wave database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded pilot system still has one stabilization value recorded only in a local operations note. What should the administrator do before accepting the rollout comparison?

• A. Reconcile the pilot configuration value into the central administration record before acceptance.
• B. Remove the documented value from the wave database record so both records appear similar.
• C. Accept the comparison because both systems allow reporting connections.
• D. Continue the rollout and review the local operations note after plant users begin testing.